The 'Alternative Media' Can't Handle 

The Truth About Cliff Richard

When the truth about him unravels, the world will be shocked to learn about what Cliff Richard has been involved in and what he has succeeded in getting away with for so long.

Yet, with few exceptions, the 'Alternative Media' have made little or no critical comment on the Cliff Richard case. If they were really so much better than the orthodox, commercial media as they tend to present themselves as being to their audiences, then they would not have been paying so little attention to what Cliff Richard has got up to and got away with.

They would have long ago acknowledged that he is as significant in his own way as, for example: Jeffrey Epstein and Jimmy Savile.

Up to now, the 'Alternative Media' have done no better in exposing Cliff Richard to serious challenge during his lifetime than they were able to do in the case of his friend, Jimmy Savile while he was alive. No British journalist or broadcaster working for the orthodox British media seems to have learnt anything from the Jimmy Savile case, as has been evidenced by their shamefully uncritical engagement with the Cliff Richard case. The learning has been limited to to members of the public not in the media - thousands of them - who are rightly suspicious and critically questioning of Cliff Richard.. and, just a few people or groups of people, who could be termed 'Alternative Media'.

British Media people, with few exceptions have engaged with the Cliff Richard case in a wilfully ignorant or complicit manner. Honourable reaction is largely restricted to unaligned people, who are just sensitive and perceptive enough to see through the veil of propaganda. It is with these exceptional people, not connected to media empires (small or large) that the highest hope seems to flourish, with the capability to thrust the awful truth about Cliff Richard before much greater numbers of the as yet substantially misled British people.